NEWT: As you return as a member of the NEWT staff, what do you see as the present opportunities and challenges in wilderness conservation?
TB: While there are nuances linked to this particular cultural moment, in general the challenges are the same that wilderness advocates have always faced. Anyone who has ever tried paddling upriver knows it is can be tough going. Wilderness-focused conservationists are ever paddling against strong cultural, political, and economic currents. We’re fighting a very old story—that the world was put here for us (people) and that to “subdue,” “improve,” and “develop” land (and profit from that work) equals progress. This story is so ingrained that it’s adopted without examination, it’s simply unquestioned, which makes it the most powerful kind of authority in a culture. (Hat tip to writers Neil Evernden and Eileen Crist on that last point.)
And yet, despite the obstacles and despite having always been a minority even within the conservation movement, wilderness proponents have had many successes. Americans now enjoy a National Wilderness Preservation System on federal public lands; various states have wilderness area or equivalent designations; and some land trusts, including Northeast Wilderness Trust, are expanding wilderness protection on private lands.
The opportunities to protect more wilderness, expand the base of support for wild places, and tell a new (old) story of reciprocity between humans and our wild cousins in the community of life are boundless. The hard truth is that it’s urgent we do this more effectively, at a larger scale, with greater funding, and more quickly. The ways that wild places not only safeguard the homes of the creatures who live there but offer profound benefits to humanity are many. I believe the work we do is central to addressing the overarching challenge of our time—the intertwined crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. Wilderness protection can help counter both if done at scale. And the result would be wildly beneficial to people.