Tag Archive for: Education

Towards Coexistence with Large Predators

Northeast Wilderness Trust’s (NEWT) conservation work is guided by a trio of principles: cores, corridors, and carnivores. These, referred to as the “3Cs,” inform NEWT’s decision-making when prioritizing potential land projects in pursuit of an ecologically connected and vibrant Northeast.

The third of these principles, carnivores, refers to the presence on wildlands of large predator species. These species exert downward pressure on the web of life that makes up ecosystems, helping to keep them balanced. But human domination of the landscape, as well as outright extermination campaigns of these species in some instances, has led to the decimation of these vital ecosystem engineers and their disappearance from wide swathes of their original ranges, with far-ranging consequences for ecological health and resilience.

In the Northeast, the two primary predator species now mostly absent from the landscape are wolves and mountain lions. The latter of these was the focus of NEWT’s recent Speaker Series webinar, “The Role of Large Carnivores in Rewilding Ecosystems.” Dr. Mark Elbroch of Panthera, the global wildcat conservation organization, joined NEWT’s Wildlands Ecology Director Shelby Perry for a conversation about mountain lions (or catamounts, or cougars, or pumas, or any of the “more than 250 names documented across the Americas” for this species, according to Elbroch) and the ecosystem role of large predators.

NEWT Testifies in the Vermont Statehouse on the Value of Wildlands

In late January, NEWT’s Wildlands Ecology Director Shelby Perry was invited to testify before the Committee on Environment of the Vermont House of Representatives. The focus of the Committee’s meeting was the value of old and wild forests in Vermont Conservation Design (VCD), a statewide framework meant to guide efforts to preserve Vermont’s landscapes and biodiversity. (Perry was part of the team responsible for the latest update to VCD, published just over one year ago.) As Vermont’s human and natural communities change, state lawmakers are looking to VCD and the experts who had a hand in building it to ensure that state-led conservation initiatives balance the needs of Vermont’s many stakeholder communities.

Perry’s testimony made the case for robust representation of wildlands in VCD implementation planning. In her presentation, titled “Protecting the Wild: Northeast Wilderness Trust and the Case for Wildlands Conservation in Vermont,” she told Committee members that just 3.7 percent of Vermont is protected wilderness, where Nature directs the ebb and flow of life. These places tend to store more carbon than managed tracts, and act as critical havens of biodiversity in an era of precipitous wildlife declines. Perry then delved into the meticulous research and analysis that informed VCD, as well as ongoing work to improve the framework as a tool for creating a vibrant, resilient conservation landscape in Vermont.

To watch Perry’s testimony and presentation, play the YouTube video below. Her full written remarks follow.

January 30, 2025
Shelby Perry
Wildlands Ecology Director
Northeast Wilderness Trust
17 State Street, Suite 302
Montpelier, VT 05602

Testimony to House Committee on the Environment
Re: Northeast Wilderness Trust and Wildlands and Old Forest Background

Madame Chair and Members of the Committee:

Setting the Stage

History is a critical baseline from which to discuss wilderness conservation. Starting about 100,000 years ago an ice sheet covered all of the Northeast. That lasted until about 12,000 years ago. Following the retreat of the ice, humans arrived in this region, and for the next several thousand years before the arrival of European colonists, the region was home to many rich Indigenous cultures and a diversity of old forests that today we would call “old growth.” The region was a tapestry of diverse human and natural communities and was between 90 and 93% forested.

European colonists arrived in the late 1400s, with the establishment of colonies picking up steam in the 1600s. In an ecological split second, upwards of 80% of the forested landscape was cleared by the early 1900s in a race to domesticate the land for agriculture and produce charcoal and timber. Though these colonists had entered a landscape with a long and rich history of human habitation and use of the land, the scale of use and technology utilized by these new inhabitants far outpaced that of those they displaced.

From that ecological devastation, the modern wilderness movement was born. From his family cabin in the Adirondacks, Howard Zahniser, principal author of the Wilderness Act (1964), had a look at what forever wild conservation could do, and penned the wilderness act with these outcomes in mind. In it he chose the word “untrammeled” to refer to wildlands, using the word specifically because it does not refer to lands that are pristine or untouched, but instead means “not deprived of freedom.”

Wilderness as a conservation outcome is indeed a relatively recent concept in the long history of human presence in our region, but so too is industrialization, urbanization, anthropogenic climate change, the extirpation of apex predators, the damming of rivers, and the rapid loss of natural areas, biodiversity, and ecological function. Wilderness as a legal designation didn’t need to exist 400 years ago, but I would argue it does today. It is a critical component of a strategic and resilient vision that also includes woodlands, farmlands, communities, cities, and everything in between. Remembering the logging and cleared lands of our not-so-distant past are important reminders that wilderness conservation is not about conserving pristine or “unpeopled” landscapes, an all-too-common misconception. It’s about freedom and equity for the entire life community.

Introduction to Northeast Wilderness Trust

“Wilderness is not a special kind of place, but rather a special commitment we can make to any place.”

This quote is from Daryl Burtnett, a former ED of Northeast Wilderness Trust (NEWT), in response to a comment from another land trust professional about there being “no wilderness left to protect” in the northeast. Daryl is making the point that wilderness is a choice, it is about deciding to reserve some places particularly for the non-human world to experience freedom.

If wilderness is a choice then, Wilderness, by definition, can be found anywhere where humans decide to make this choice. It is a place where humans decide to practice humility, and concede that some places deserve to exist unencumbered by human expectations and desires. The moment Northeast Wilderness Trust protects a place, we are taking an intentional step, a radical one, to step aside and to let nature control its destiny. That is the essence of our work.

Northeast Wilderness Trust (NEWT) is a non-profit land trust based in Montpelier, VT and focused exclusively on wildlands conservation in New England and New York. With a mission of protecting forever-wild landscapes for nature and people, we envision a landscape of connected, resilient wildlands shared by a human culture that recognizes the benefits of wild places. To date, we protect over 93,000 acres either through fee ownership, deed restriction, or conservation easement. We protect over 18,000 acres in Vermont.

Wildlands and Old Forests

81% of New England is forested, and only 3.3% is wildlands. In Vermont that number is closer to 3.7%, does that mean that VT has 3.7% old forest?

Just like the person who told Daryl that there was “no wilderness left” in the northeast, sometimes these two terms get mixed up, but they are not precisely analogous. One refers to a protection status (protected as forever-wild) and the other refers to a forest structural condition, one that usually requires extended periods without human-caused disturbance to develop.

If we were to think of these two terms as a Venn diagram, there would be some overlap, but it would not be complete. Many of the wildlands protected in VT have not yet developed old forest structure, but some have. Likewise, some of the old forests of Vermont are protected from harvest, but some are not.

These old forest features support a suite of species that rely on minimally disturbed forests. The suite of species changes with the forest type – so the biodiversity values of protected old forest of the Northern Hardwood assemblage are different from that of a Spruce-Fir Forest, for example. Ideally, wildlands protections would be proportionally representative of the different types of forest communities.

Ecological Representation of Wildlands

Vermont Conservation Design (VCD), presented to the committee last week by Robert Zaino, an ecologist with Vermont Fish and Wildlife, sets an old forest target for VT of roughly 15% of highest priority forest blocks, which works out to about 10% of Vermont. The Wildlands report from WWF&C which Liz Thompson of Wildlands, Woodlands, Farmlands, and Communities presented to the committee earlier this morning sets a goal of 10% of the region and makes a recommendation to “evaluate elevating the goal for wildlands in the region to 20% or more.” Both indicate that these protected wildlands and old forests should be broadly representative of forest types.

I’ve been part of a collaboration with both of these efforts to look at how representative our wildlands currently are, meaning what forest types are we doing a good job of protecting as wildlands, and what forest types are we missing. VCD breaks VT up into nine biophysical regions, areas that host similar ecology throughout. Of these nine biophysical regions, we have nearly reached that 10% goal in just two of them, the Northern Green Mountains and the Southern Green Mountains. The Vermont Valley and the Champlain Hills are the two farthest away from the target, each having made very little progress toward that 10% goal, meaning that there will be few old forests of the forest types common in this region, and putting at a disadvantage all of the species that rely on them. Slide 18 of my accompanying PDF shows these tables.

This gives us an idea of where progress could be made to make wildlands conservation representative of biophysical regions in the state, but this is only one layer of representation. Ideally you want those protected acres to also be broadly representative of the forest types that occur within each biophysical region as well.

So how closely does the composition of protected forest match up with the composition of the entire forest? In a perfect world, each forest type would make up the same percentage of protected wildlands in a region, as it does in the region as a whole. Meaning that if a forest type makes up 20% of the total forest, it should also make up 20% of the wild forest within that biophysical region.

Slide 24 of the accompanying PDF shows the breakdown of forest types and wildlands within the Southern Green Mountains biophysical region of VT. Forest types in the table where the green bar is higher (arrow 1) are more common in the biophysical region than they are in the wildlands, and when the blue bar is higher (like arrow 2) that forest type makes up a higher percentage of protected wildlands than percentage of the overall matrix forest. This is not a bad thing – and usually occurs with higher elevation community types. Higher elevation areas often have sensitive ecology and are more often protected as wild, but we want to make sure we don’t miss providing protections for a representative percentage of the lower elevation communities too – so we can be sure to represent the full ecology of a biophysical region in protected wildlands and their future old forests.

Role of Private Lands

So far I have been referencing biophysical regions, which are a product of VCD. They are similar, but not identical to EPA ecoregions, but they are only mapped for VT, so when we are looking at the whole northeast, we need to use ecoregions. The map on slide 30 of the PDF color codes ecoregions by perfect wildlands, from the Wildlands Dataset that resulted from the Wildlands Report. A few patterns are immediately visible: We’ve done a pretty good job protecting wildlands at high elevations and along mountain ranges, we’ve done a better job protecting northern forest types than southern, and even within VT there are big gaps in lower elevation protections, like in the Champlain and Connecticut River Valleys.

We know that these areas host a really different roster of species from the higher elevation forests of the Adirondacks and Appalachians, where wildlands protections are high. Reaching our old forest and wildlands targets here will require more than just upgrading protections on already protected lands, it will also require new wildlands conservation. This effort will necessarily require both public and private conservation work.

NEWT is a member of the Forest Partnership, a coalition of organizations focused on the development of policy and creative funding opportunities to conserve forestland, and public awareness about the risks of increasing forest fragmentation. We also participate in the Forest Roundtable, Vermont Biodiversity Alliance, Wildlands Woodlands, Farmlands and Communities, the Maine Mountain Collaborative, the Staying Connected Initiative and more. Partnerships like these help Vermont and the region take a long-term view on the maintenance and protection of our forests and keep both public and private lands organizations aligned and updated on progress towards common goals.

A lot of really dedicated people are working together in Vermont and across the region to take a balanced look at our forests, and how we want to sustain them into the future, maintaining the integrity of and sustainability of both our managed (often called “working”) forests, while also extending protections to increase the amount of old and wild forest in our region. This work is both complementary and necessary to ensure an enduring home for both human and non-human residents of Vermont’s forest. We can and must do both, and I’m convinced the best outcome will come from working across interests and affiliations to chart a collaborative and cooperative path forward together.

Thank you for the opportunity to address the committee, and thank you for all of the work you do on behalf of Vermont’s environment and forests.

Perspectives on Rewilding, from the Northeast to the Great Plains

Herds of mammoth. Saber-tooth tigers lurking in the tall grasses. American cheetahs—yes, you read that correctly—speeding after pronghorns.

Thousands of years ago, this was the scene on the Great Plains—current day Colorado and surrounding states. Tall- and shortgrass prairie predominated across a wide swathe of the lower 48 states, maintained by grazing bison and natural fires that kept woody encroachment by shrubs and trees at bay. This was a rich, biodiverse expanse that, in its labyrinthian root systems in the soil, sequestered vast quantities of carbon. In the words of Henry Pollock, the executive director of Southern Plains Land Trust (SPLT) and the kickoff speaker in Northeast Wilderness Trust’s (NEWT) 2025 Speaker Series, the prairie was “a veritable American Serengeti.” Pollock and NEWT President and CEO Jon Leibowitz discussed the differing challenges and opportunities in rewilding the Great Plains and NEWT’s service region, the Northeast. Check out the full recording of the webinar below.

At the same point in geological time that mammoths, tigers, and cheetahs prowled the Plains, old forests sprawled across what is now New England a thousand or more miles east. Hurricanes, ice storms, and other forms of natural disturbance blew through every so often, felling trees, opening up canopy gaps, and creating structural complexity. In these great forested wildlands, wolves and cougars hunted deer and other ungulates. Streams and rivers shaded by hemlocks teemed with brook trout and Atlantic salmon. Massive flocks of passenger pigeons darkened the skies.  Caribou walked across parts of the landscape and harbor seals called Lake Champlain home.

Northeast Wilderness Trust hosts third Learning Circle Book Group

Sign up to join Northeast Wilderness Trust’s third Learning Circle book group. We will discuss The Overstory by Richard Powers, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 2019. The novel follows nine people as their lives become entwined in the fight to save old-growth forests.

The novel integrates recent learning about trees and old-growth forests and highlights NEWT’s belief that We are One of Many.

The Learning Circle book group will meet via Zoom on three Wednesdays, January 29, February 19, and March 12, from 7:30 pm to 8:30 pm EDT. Three sessions will allow participants to get to know each other and to divide the reading and discussion into three parts. The January 29 session will cover the first 150 pages of The Overstory.

If you are interested in participating, please register below by December 31, 2024. Details on the sessions and Zoom link will be emailed to registered participants in early January 2025. You may participate even if you can only attend two of the three sessions. David Hindin, a NEWT supporter who facilitated the first two Learning Circle book groups, will again be our facilitator.

We look forward to meeting you!

NEWT and Partners Convene in Boston to Make the Case for Rewilding

“How do we create a more habitable world for our children, for our grandchildren, and for all the species with whom we share this beautiful planet” at a time of climate change and an accelerating extinction crisis? This was the central question posed by Kelsey Wirth, Founder of Mothers Out Front, at a panel and reception event convened by Northeast Wilderness Trust (NEWT) last month.

There is, of course, no single solution to these multidimensional challenges, but NEWT leaders and key partners shared the power and promise of forever-wild land conservation with a sold-out audience at WBUR CitySpace in Boston, Massachusetts.

NEWT President and CEO Jon Leibowitz argued that to preserve the Northeast’s natural heritage and the wellbeing of future human and nonhuman generations, we should intentionally create room for Nature to do what it did on its own for millions of years before human intervention: evolve freely, with forests growing old, fostering biodiversity, and storing massive amounts of carbon.

This may sound like a straightforward proposal, but in Leibowitz’s words, rewilding is an “incredibly underutilized” conservation tool. Though New England is more than 80-percent forested, just 3.3 percent of these forests are protected in perpetuity as wildlands, where Nature calls the shots. Increasing this number by creating more wilderness preserves means “to work with Nature, rather than against it,” Leibowitz added. Rewilding “restores ecosystems not through control or manipulation, but by trusting in Nature’s innate resilience and proven ability to find stability.”

The Wild Times: June

NEWT named “Conservationist of the Year” plus our newest land acquisition, wildlife photos from our stewards, and more June updates.

The Wild Times: May

Land protection highlights and other updates from the Wilderness Trust.

Northeast Wilderness Trust hosts second Learning Circle book group

Sign up to join Northeast Wilderness Trust’s second Learning Circle book group. 

The Wild Times: January and February

With an additional 6,354 acres protected in 2023, last year was wildly successful for wilderness recovery, thanks to you. Places like Moriah Wilderness Preserve in New York and Sargent Hill Wilderness Preserve in Vermont, both protected last year, have begun their rewilding journey.

Northeast Wilderness Trust hosts first Learning Circle book group

Northeast Wilderness Trust is launching our first Learning Circle book group in January 2024.

Slime Molds Galore!

Animal, vegetable, mineral…or none of the above? Learn about the surprising lives of slime molds (myxomycetes) in our Slime Mold naturalist presentation by Stewardship Director Shelby Perry, which was hosted live on April 27, 2020.